None Dare Call It Conspiracy
by Gary Allen
Concord Press, 1971, paperback
Most of us believe socialism is what the socialists want us to
believe it is-a share-the-wealth program. That is the theory.
But is that how it works? Let us examine the only Socialist countries-according
to the Socialist definition of the word-extant in the world today.
These are the Communist countries. The Communists themselves refer
to these as Socialist countries, as in the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics. Here in the reality of socialism you have a tiny oligarchial
clique at the top, usually numbering no more than three percent
of the total population, controlling the total wealth, total production
and the very lives of the other ninety-seven percent cent...
If one understands that socialism is not
a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate
and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of superrich
men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it
becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs.
Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of
the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite.
If you wanted to control the nation's manufacturing, commerce,
finance, transportation and natural resources, you would need
only to control the apex, the power pinnacle, of an all-powerful
socialist government. Then you would have a monopoly and could
squeeze out all your competitors. If you wanted a national monopoly,
you must control a national socialist government. If you want
- a worldwide monopoly, you must control a world socialist government.
That is what the game is all about. "Communism" is not
a movement of the downtrodden masses but is a movement created,
manipulated and used by power-seeking billionaires in order to
gain control over the world . . . first by establishing socialist
governments in the various nations and then consolidating them
all through a "Great Merger," into an all-powerful world,
socialist super-state ...
Where do governments get the enormous amounts money they need?
Most, of course, comes from taxation; but governments often spend
more than they are willing to tax from their citizens and so are
forced to borrow.
The public is led to believe that our
government borrows from "the people" through savings
bonds. Actually, only the smallest percentage of the national
debt is held by individuals in this form. Most government bonds,
except those owned by the government itself through its trust
funds, are held by vast banking firms known as international banks.
For centuries there has been big money
to be made by international bankers in the financing of governments
and kings. Such operators are faced, however, with certain, thorny
problems. We know that smaller banking operations protect themselves
by taking collateral, but what kind of collateral can you get
from a government or 'a king? What if the banker comes to collect
and the king says, "Off with his head"? The process
through which one collects a debt from a government or a monarch
is not a subject taught in the business schools of our universities,
and most of us-never having been in the business of financing
kings-have not given the problem much thought. But there is a
king-financing business and to those who can ensure collection
it is lucrative indeed.
Economics Professor Stuart Crane notes
that there are two means used to collateralize loans to governments
and kings. Whenever a business firm borrows big money its creditor
obtains a voice in management to protect his investment. Like
a business, no government can borrow big money unless willing
to surrender to the creditor some measure of sovereignty as collateral.
Certainly international bankers who have loaned hundreds of billions
of dollars to governments around the world command considerable
influence in the policies of such governments.
But the ultimate advantage the creditor
has over the king or president is that if the ruler gets out of
line the banker can finance his enemy or rival. Therefore, if
you want to stay in the lucrative king-financing business, it
is wise, to have an enemy or rival waiting in the wings to unseat
every king or president to whom you lend. If the king doesn't
have an enemy, you must create one.
Preeminent in playing this game was the
famous House of Rothschild. Its founder, Meyer Amschel Rothschild
(1743-1812) of Frankfurt, Germany, kept one of his five sons at
home to run the Frankfurt bank and sent the others to London,
Paris, Vienna and Naples. The Rothschilds became incredibly wealthy
during the nineteenth century by financing governments to fight
... In describing the characteristics
of the Rothschilds and other major international bankers, Dr.
Quigley tells us that they remained different from ordinary bankers
in several ways: they were cosmopolitan and international; they
were close to governments and were particularly concerned with
government debts, including foreign government debts; these bankers
came to be called "international bankers."
Since the keystone of the international banking empires has been
government bonds, it has been in the interest of these international
bankers to encourage government debt. The higher The debt the
more the interest. Nothing drives government deeply into debt
like a war; and it. has not been an uncommon practice among international
bankers to finance both sides of the bloodiest military conflicts.
For example, during our Civil War the North was financed by the
Rothschilds through their American agent, August Belmont, and
the American South through the Erlangers, Rothschild relatives.
But while wars and revolutions have been
useful to international bankers in gaining or increasing control
over governments, the key to such control has always been control
of money. You can control a government if you have it in your
debt; a creditor is in a position to demand the privileges of
monopoly from the sovereign. Money-seeking governments have granted
monopolies in state banking, natural resources, oil concessions
and transportation. However, the monopoly which the international
financiers most covet is control over a nation's money.
Eventually these international bankers
actually owned as private corporations the central banks of the
various European nations. The Bank of England, Bank of France
and Bank of Germany were not owned by their respective governments,
as almost everyone imagines, but were privately owned monopolies
granted by the heads of state, usually in return for loans.
Reginald McKenna, President of the Midlands Bank of England
Those that create and issue the money
and credit direct the policies of government and hold in their
hands the destiny of the people.
The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx - fifth plank - to ensure control
Centralization of credit in the hands
of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and
an exclusive monopoly.
The international bankers created a series of panics as a demonstration
of their power - a warning of what would happen unless the rest
of the bankers got into line. The man in charge of conducting
these lessons was J. Pierpont Morgan, American-born but educated
in England and Germany. Morgan is referred to by many ... as the
top American gent of the English Rothschilds.
How powerful is our "central bank?" The Federal Reserve
controls our money supply and interest rates, and thereby manipulates
the entire economy - creating inflation or deflation, recession
or boom, and sending the stock market up or down at whim.
Using a central bank to create alternate periods of inflation
and deflation, and thus whipsawing the public for vast profits,
had been worked out by the international bankers to an exact science.
... Between 1923 and 1929, the Federal
Reserve expanded (inflated) the money supply by sixty-two percent.
Much of this new money was used to bid the stock market up to
The House Hearings on Stabilization of the Purchasing Power of
the Dollar disclosed evidence in 1928 that the Federal Reserve
Board was working closely with the heads of European central banks.
The Committee warned that a major crash had been planned in 1927.
At a secret luncheon of the Federal Reserve Board and heads of
the European central banks, the committee warned, the international
bankers were tightening the noose.
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of
England, came to Washington on February 6, 1929, to confer with
Andrew Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury. On November 11, 1927,
the Wall Street Journal described Mr. Norman as "the currency
dictator of Europe." Professor Carroll Quigley notes that
Norman, a close confidant of J. P. Morgan, admitted: "I hold
the hegemony of the world." Immediately after this mysterious
visit, the Federal Reserve Board reversed its easy-money policy
and began raising the discount rate. The balloon which had been
inflated constantly for nearly seven years was about. to be exploded.
On October 24, the feathers hit the fan.
Writing in The United States' Unresolved Monetary and Political
Problems, William Bryan describes what happened:
When everything was ready, the New York
financiers started calling 24 hour broker call loans. This meant
that the stock brokers and the customers had to dump their stock
on the market in order to pay the loans. This naturally collapsed
the stock market and brought a banking collapse all over the country
because the banks not owned by the oligarchy were heavily involved
in broker call claims at this time, and bank runs soon exhausted
their coin and currency and they had to close. The Federal Reserve
System would not come to their aid, although they were instructed
under the law to maintain an elastic currency.
The investing public, including most stock
brokers and bankers, took a horrendous blow in the crash, but
not the insiders. They were either out of the market or had sold
"short" so that they made enormous profits as the Dow
To think that the scientifically engineered Crash of '29 was an
accident or the result of stupidity defies all logic. The international
bankers who promoted the inflationary policies and pushed the
propaganda which pumped up the stock market represented too many
generations of accumulated expertise to have blundered into "the
Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of
the House" Banking and Currency Committee, commented:
It [the depression] was not accidental.
It was a carefully contrived occurrence .... The international
bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that
they might emerge as the rulers of us all.
Oswald Spengler, historian, in Decline of the West
There is no proletarian, not even a Communist,
movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, in
the direction indicated by money, and for the time being permitted
by money - and that without the idealists among its leaders having
the' slightest suspicion of the fact.
The best way for the insiders to eliminate ... growing competition
was to impose a progressive income tax on their competitors while
writing the laws so as to include built-in escape hatches for
themselves. Actually, very few of the proponents of the graduated
income tax realized they were playing into the hands of those
they were seeking to control. As Ferdinand Lundberg notes in The
Rich And The Super-Rich:
What it [the income tax] became, finally,
was a siphon gradually inserted into the pocketbooks of the general
public. Imposed to popular huzzas as a class tax, the income tax
was gradually turned into a mass tax in a jiujitsu turnaround...
... The escape hatch for the insiders
to avoid paying tax was ready. By the time the [income tax] Amendment
had been approved by the states (even before the income-tax was
passed), the Rockefellers and Carnegie foundations were in full
operation... These monopolists could now compound their wealth
tax-free while competitors had to face a graduated income tax
which made it difficult to amass capital.
... the conspirators now had created the
mechanisms to run up the debt, to collect the debt, and (for themselves)
to avoid the taxes required to pay the yearly interest on the
debt. Then all that was needed was a reason to escalate the debt.
Nothing runs up a national debt like a war. And World War I was
being brewed in Europe.
In the Bolshevik Revolution we see many of the same old faces
that were responsible for creating the Federal Reserve System,
initiating the graduated income tax, set. ting up the tax-free
foundations and pushing us into WWI...
No revolution can be successful without
organization and money. "The downtrodden masses" usually
provide little of the former and none of the latter. But Insiders
at the top can arrange for both.
What did these people possibly have to
gain in financing the Russian Revolution? What did they have to
gain by keeping it alive and afloat, or, during the 1920's by
pouring millions of dollars into what Lenin called his New Economic
Program, thus saving the Soviets from collapse?
Why would these "capitalists"
do all this? If your goal is global conquest, you have to start
somewhere. It may or may not have been coincidental, but Russia
was the one major European country without a central bank. In
Russia, for the first time, the Communist conspiracy gained a
geographical homeland from which to launch assaults against the
other nations of the world. The West now had an enemy.
In the Bolshevik Revolution we have some
of the world's richest and most powerful men financing a movement
which claims its very existence is based on the concept of stripping
of their wealth men like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Schiffs,
Warburgs, Morgans, Harrimans, and Milners. But obviously these
men have no fear of international Communism. It is only logical
to assume that if they financed it and do not fear it, it must
be because they control it. Can there be any other explanation
that makes sense? Remember that for over 150 years it has been
standard operating procedure of the Rothschilds and their allies
to control both sides of every conflict. You must 'have an "enemy"
if you are going to collect from the King. The East-West balance-of-power
politics is used as one of the main excuses for the socialization
A clique of American financiers not only helped establish Communism
in Russia, but has striven mightily ever since to keep it alive.
Ever since 1918 this clique has been engaged in transferring money
and, probably more important, technical information, to the Soviet
Union. This is made abundantly clear in the three volume history
Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development by scholar
Anthony Sutton of Stanford Universitys Hoover Institution on War,
Revolution and Peace. Using, for the most part, official State
Department documents, Sutton shows conclusively that virtually
everything the Soviets possess has been acquired from the West.
It is not much of an exaggeration to say that the U.S.S.R. was
made in the U.S.A..
Communism is an arm of a bigger conspiracy to control the world
by power-mad billionaires (and brilliant but ruthless academicians
who have shown them how to (use their power)...
One must draw the distinction between competitive free enterprise
... and cartel capitalism dominated by industrial monopolists
and international bankers. The difference is the private enterpriser
operates by offering products and services in a competitive free
market while the cartel capitalist uses the government to force
the public to do business with him. These corporate socialists
are the deadly enemies of competitive private enterprise.
Liberals are willing to believe that these
"robber barons" will fix prices, rig markets, establish
monopolies, buy politicians, exploit employees and fire them the
day before they are eligible for pensions, but they absolutely
will not believe that these same men would want to rule the world
or would use Communism as the striking edge of their conspiracy.
If you wish to establish national monopolies, you must control
national governments. If you wish to establish international monopolies
or cartels, you must control a world government.
The Round Table organization in England grew, out of the life-long
dream of gold and diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes for a "new
Rhodes' biographer Sara Millin was a little
more direct. As she put it: "The government of the world
was Rhodes' simple desire."
"In the middle 1890's Rhodes had
a personal income of at least a million pounds sterling a year
(then about five million dollars) which he spent so freely for
his mysterious purposes that he was usually overdrawn on his account
Cecil Rhodes' commitment to a conspiracy
to establish World Government was set down in a series of wills
described by Frank Aydelotte in his book American Rhodes Scholarships.
The seven wills which Cecil Rhodes made
between the ages of 24 and 46 [Rhodes died at age forty-eight]
constitute a kind of spiritual autobiography. . . Best known are
the first (the Secret Society Will... ), and the last, which established
the Rhodes Scholarships.
In his first will Rhodes states his aim
still more specifically: 'The extension of British rule throughout
the world . . . . the foundation of so great a power as to hereafter
render wars impossible and promote the interests of humanity.'
Professor Carroll Quigley
At the end of the war of 1914, it became
clear that the organization of this system [the Round Table Group]
had to be greatly extended... established, in England and each
dominion, a front organization to the existing Round Table Group.
This front organization, called the Royal Institute of International
Affairs, had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged
Round Table Group. In New York it was known as the Council on
Foreign Relations, and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company
in association with the very small American Round Table Group.
The policies promoted by the C.F.R. in the fields of defense and
international relations become, with a regularity which defies
the laws of chance, the official policies of the United States
As World War II approached, the Round
Table Group was influential in seeing that Hitler was not stopped
in Austria, the Rhineland, or Sudetenland - and thereby was largely
responsible for precipitating the holocaust. A second world war
would greatly enhance the opportunity for establishment of World
Government. The financing for Adolph Hitler's rise to power was
handled through the Warburg-controlled Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam
and later by the J. Henry Schroeder Bank with branches in Frankfurt,
London and New York. Chief legal counsel to the J. Henry Schroeder
Bank was the firm of Sullivan and Cromwell whose senior partners
included John Foster and Allen Dulles.
... With the Round Table doing its work
in Europe, the C.F.R. carried the ball in the United States. The
Council's first task was to infiltrate and develop effective control
of the U.S. State Department-to make certain that after World
War II there would be no slip-ups as there had been following
World War 1. The story of the C.F.R. takeover of the Department
of State is contained in State Department Publication 2349, Report
To The President On The Results of the San Francisco Conference.
It is the report of Secretary of State Edward R. Stettinius (C.F.R.)
to President Truman. On page twenty we find:
With the outbreak of war in Europe it
was clear that. the United States would b confronted, after the
war, with new and exceptional problem. . . '. Accordingly, a Committee
on Post-War Problems was set up before the end of 1939 [two years
before the U, S. entered the. war], at the suggestion of the C.F.R.
The Committee consisted of high officials of the Department of
State [all but one of whom were C.F.R. members]. It was assisted
by a research staff [provided by, financed by, and directed by
the C.F.R.], which in February, 1941, was organized into a Division
of Special Research [and went off the C.F.R. payroll and onto
that of the State Department].
[After Pearl Harbor] the research facilities
were rapidly expanded, and the Departmental Committee on Post-War
Problems was reorganized into an Advisory Committee on Post-War
Foreign Policies [completely staffed by the C.F.R.}.
Today the C.F.R. remains active in working toward its final goal
of a government over all the world-a government which the Insiders
and their allies will control. The goal of the C.F.R. is simply
to abolish the United States with its Constitutional guarantees
of liberty. And they don't even try to hide it. Study No. 7, published
by the C.F.R. on November 25, 1959, openly advocates "building
a new international order [which] must be responsive to world
aspirations for peace, [and] for social and economic change .
. . an international order ... including states labeling themselves
as "Socialist" [Communist].
The C.F.R. [Council on Foreign Relations] is totally interlocked
with the major foundations and so-called "Think Tanks."
Included in the interlock are the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie
foundations and the Rand Corporation, Hudson Institute, Fund for
Republic and Brookings Institute "Think Tanks.
Professor Carroll Quigley
There does exist, and has existed for
a generation, an international... network. In fact, this network
which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion
to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently
The Federal Reserve-CFR Insiders began pushing to open up Communist
Russia to U. S. traders soon after the revolution. However, at
that time public opinion ran so high against the Bolsheviks because
of their barbarism that it was official U. S. government policy
not to deal with the outlaw government. The U. S. did not officially
recognize the Bolsheviks until 1933. In the meantime, the Soviet
economy was in a shambles and the people were starving to death.
Communism would have collapsed had it not been aided by the Insiders.
The Bolsheviks were originally saved from collapse by Herbert
Hoover (CFR) who raised money to buy food which was appropriated
by Lenin and his gangsters.. They used it as a tool to subdue
starving peasants who had been resisting their newly imposed slave
masters. While Hoover's "humanitarian" gesture saved
the Soviet regime, the Russian economy was still in total chaos.
In came the Vanderlips, Harrimans and Rockefellers. One of the
first to jump was Frank Vanderlip, an agent of the Rockefellers
and one of the Jekyll Island conspirators, president of the Rockefeller
First National City Bank, who compared Lenin to George Washington.
Averill Harriman in a report to the State Department in June,
1944, quoted by Anthony Sutton
Stalin paid tribute to the assistance
rendered by the United States to Soviet industry before and during
the war. He said that about two-thirds of all the large industrial
enterprise in the Soviet Union had been built with United States
help or technical assistance.
New World Order