
John Negroponte

A Servant of the Empire
by Matthew Rothschild
excerpted from the The Progressive
magazine, April 2005
If you wink at torture, if you don't mind
mass slaughter, if lying is of no concern to you, you can go far
in this world.
Just ask John Negroponte.
He served as a State Department political
officer in Saigon from 1964 to 1968, and then he headed up the
Vietnam desk at the National Security Council from 1971 to 1973.
During that decade, the Johnson-Nixon war was killing three million
people in Indochina, along with 58,000 U.S. soldiers.
But Negroponte did not want the war to
end. In fact, as an aide to Henry Kissinger at the Paris peace
talks, he urged Kissinger not to come to terms.
A decade later in Central America, Negroponte
essentially ran the illegal Contra War against Nicaragua from
his post as U.S. ambassador to Honduras.
This war cost the lives of some 30,000
people.
An inescapable feature of U.S.-
Central America policy in the 1980s was
support for torturers. Here, Negroponte did his part.
In particular, he knew about and supported
Battalion 316, the Honduran intelligence unit, trained by the
CIA, that killed at least 184 people. One of those was the former
secretary to Archbishop Oscar Romero of El Salvador, himself the
victim of a CIA-funded death squad in 1980. The secretary fled
to Honduras after Romero's assassination. Battalion 316 then abducted
her and threw her from a helicopter to her death.
In 1995, the Baltimore Sun ran a prizewinning
series on Battalion 316.
It concluded that Negroponte knew about
the tortures and murders and covered them up. Under his direct
supervision, the embassy prepared reports to Congress that never
mentioned the brutality of the Honduran military, the Sun reported.
This omission allowed Honduras to keep getting U.S. funding.
"I do not believe that death squads
were operating in Honduras," Negroponte testified before
Congress in 2001.
But here's what the Sun said. "The
intelligence unit, known as Battalion 316, used shock and suffocation
devices in interrogations," it reported. "Prisoners
often were kept naked and, when no longer useful, killed and buried
in unmarked graves. Newly declassified documents and other sources
show that the CIA and the U.S. Embassy knew of numerous crimes,
including murder and torture, committed by Battalion 316, yet
continued to collaborate closely with its leaders."
When he took office in 2001, George W.
Bush plucked Negroponte to be U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
There Negroponte led the diplomatic offensive for the war on Iraq,
trumpeting the now-discredited claims about weapons of mass destruction
and bullying other nations to go along.
For his hard work, he was rewarded the
post of U.S. ambassador to Iraq, and from there he has risen now
to be Bush's nominee for director of national intelligence.
Negroponte has served the empire his whole
life.
To do so properly, you need to get some
blood on your résumé.
Negroponte has plenty. For Bush,
that makes him the ideal man for the job.
*****
Negroponte's Dark Past
The case against Bush's new intelligence
czar
by Robert Parry
In These Times magazine, March
2005
George W. Bush's choice of John Negroponte
to be the first U.S. intelligence czar signals that Washington
is heading down the same road that has led to earlier American
intelligence failures and controversies-from politicizing analysis
to winking at human rights abuses.
Although Negroponte's nomination is expected
to sail through the Senate, one question that might be worth asking
about his tenure as U.S. ambassador to Honduras from 1981 to 1985
is: "Were you oblivious to the Honduran military's human
rights violations and drug trafficking, or did you just ignore
these problems for geopolitical reasons?"
Negroponte either oversaw a stunningly
inept U.S. intelligence operation at the embassy in Tegucigalpa,
missing major events occurring under his nose-or he tolerated
atrocities that included torture, rape and murder, while slanting
intelligence reports to please his superiors in Washington.
'Whichever it is-incompetence or complicity-it
is hard to understand how Negroponte, the current U.S. ambassador
to Iraq, can be expected to fix the intelligence flaws revealed
by the Bush administration's failure to connect the dots before
the 9/11 terror attacks or to avert the scandalous use of torture
on Muslim suspects captured in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Despite the bipartisan praise Negroponte's
nomination has elicited, a clear-eyed look at his record suggests
that the Bush administration intends to continue making two demands
on the U.S. intelligence community: that analysts wear rose-colored
glasses when assessing U.S. policies and that field operatives
turn a blind eye to atrocities committed by U.S. allies or American
interrogators.
A history of oversight
Given the human rights records of the
Honduran military and the Nicaraguan contras who set up shop in
Honduras during Negroponte's tenure as ambassador the early '80s,
he will have no moral standing as a public official who repudiates
abusive interrogation techniques and brutal counterinsurgency
tactics. Indeed, some cynics might suggest that's one of the reasons
Bush picked him.
Negroponte's work in Honduras means, too,
that he will come to his new job with a history of forwarding
inaccurate intelligence to Washington and leaving out information
that would have upset the upper echelon of the Reagan-Bush administration.
For his part, Negroponte, who is now 65, has staunchly denied
knowledge of "death squad" operations by the Honduran
military in the '80s.
In 1983, in another move that helped the
Honduran military and the contras, the Reagan-Bush administration
closed down the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) office
at the U.S. Embassy in Tegucigalpa, just as Honduras was emerging
as an important base for cocaine transshipments to the United
States.
"Elements of the Honduran military
were involved in the protection of drug traffickers from 1980
on' is how a Senate Foreign Relations investigative report, issued
in 1989 by a subcommittee headed by Sen. John Kerry, put it. "These
activities were reported to appropriate U.S. government officials
throughout the period. Instead of moving decisively to close down
the drug trafficking by stepping up the DEA presence in the country
and using the foreign assistance the United States was extending
to the Hondurans as a lever, the United States closed the DEA
office in Tegucigalpa and appears to have ignored the issue."
It's unclear what role Negroponte played
in shutting down the DEA office in Honduras during his time as
U.S. ambassador, but it is hard to imagine that a step of that
significance could have occurred without at least his acquiescence.
Negroponte's ambassadorship also coincided
with the evolution of the Nicaraguan contra forces from a small
band under the tutelage of Argentine intelligence officers into
an irregular army supported by the CIA, and later by a secret
operation inside the White House run by National Security Council
aide Oliver North.
Recent revelations
Despite several investigations into what
became known as the Iran-Contra scandal, many documents about
Negroponte's involvement remained classified, outside public knowledge.
Some of that information bubbled to the surface in September 2001
when Negroponte was facing confirmation to be Bush's ambassador
to the United Nations.
In a Senate floor speech before Negroponte
won confirmation, Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) said, "The
picture that emerges in analyzing this new information is a troubling
one." Summarizing the new documents from the State Department
and CIA, Dodd said the evidence pointed to the fact that from
1980 to 1984, the Honduran military committed most of the country's
hundreds of human rights abuses. The documents reported that some
Honduran military units, trained by the United States, were implicated
in "death squad" operations that employed counterterrorist
tactics, including torture, rape, and assassinations against people
suspected of supporting leftist guerrillas in El Salvador or leftist
movements in Honduras.
Dodd criticized Negroponte's earlier Senate
testimony. In response to questions about one of these units,
Battalion 316, Negroponte had said, "I have never seen any
convincing substantiation that they were involved in death squad-type
activities."
"Given what we know about the extent
and nature of Honduran human rights abuses, to say that Mr. Negroponte
was less than forthcoming in his responses to my questions is
being generous." said Dodd. "I was also troubled by
Ambassador Negroponte's unwillingness to admit that-as a consequence
of other US. policy priorities-the US. Embassy, by acts of omissions,
end[ed] up shading the truth about the extent and nature of ongoing
human rights abuses in the 1980s."
"The Inter-American Court of Human
Rights had no such reluctance in assigning blame to the Honduran
government during its adjudication of a case brought against the
government of Honduras [in 1987]' Dodd said. "The Court found
that 'a practice of disappearances carried out or tolerated by
Honduran officials existed between 1981-84' ... Based upon an
extensive review of US. intelligence information by the CIA Working
Group in 1996, the CIA is prepared to stipulate that 'during the
1980-84 period, the Honduran military committed most of the hundreds
of human rights abuses reported in Honduras. These abuses were
often politically motivated and officially sanctioned"
However, when Bush nominated Negroponte
to be ambassador to Iraq in 2004, Dodd and other Democrats largely
dropped their objections. The National Catholic Reporter, which
had covered the right-wing persecution of Catholic clergy in Central
America during the '80s, was one of the few publications still
questioning Negroponte's fitness.
In an April 2004 article, the magazine
recounted a statement from Society of Helpers' Sister Laetitia
Bordes, who had gone to Honduras and approached Negroponte about
the "disappearances" of 32 women who had fled to Honduras
after rightist death squads in El Salvador assassinated Catholic
Archbishop Oscar Romero in 1980.
Later, these women, including one who
had been Romero's secretary, "were forcibly taken from their
living quarters in Tegucigalpa, pushed into a van and disappeared:'
Sister Laetitia Bordes said. "John Negroponte listened to
us as we exposed the facts .... Negroponte denied any knowledge
of the whereabouts of these women. He insisted that the US. embassy
did not interfere in the affairs of the Honduran government:'
The National Catholic Reporter noted,
"Years later, the Baltimore Sun would reveal that Negroponte
apparently knew more than he was letting on. In fact, charge his
many critics, the ambassador oversaw an exponential increase in
military aid to the Honduran army, deceptively downplayed human
rights violations, and played a key role in supporting the activities
of Battalion 316, a CIA-backed Honduran-based regional counterinsurgency
unit subsequently found to be among the cruelest of the cruel."
Many congressional Democrats, as well
as Republicans, consider those two-decade-old concerns about Central
America stale and irrelevant to Negroponte's nomination as the
nation's first National Intelligence Director. But his tenure
as ambassador to Honduras raises questions not only about his
moral judgment and integrity, but his capacity to assess information
and to ensure that political pressures don't influence intelligence
reporting.
As the first person chosen to hold this
post-with oversight responsibility for all U.S. intelligence activities-Negroponte
might legitimately be expected to represent something other than
tolerance of death squads and politicization of intelligence information.
ROBERT PARRY broke many of the Iran-Contra
stories in the '80s for the Associated Press and Newsweek His
new book; Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from
Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com,
as can his 1999 book; Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press
&'Project Truth :A version of this article appeared on ConsortiumNews.com.
*****
John Negroponte - Our Man in
Baghdad
International Socialist Review,
July/August 2004
... Real power in Iraq will continue to
lie in the hands of the military coalition and its civilian counterpart-the
newly created U.S. embassy.
When it opens on July 1, this embassy
will be the largest in the world-with 1,000 American and 700 foreign
employees. It will be double the size of the U.S. embassy in Cairo,
which is currently the largest. One State Department official
has referred to it as "an embassy on steroids." On May
6, in a greatly expedited process, the Senate confirmed Bush's
nominee to run this mission-current U.S. ambassador to the UN,
John Negroponte. It's a choice that tells you a lot about U.S.
strategy and priorities for post-June 30 Iraq.
Negroponte's career highlights from his
time as the U.S. ambassador in Honduras include:
* Supervising the creation of a death
squad unit (Battalion 316) that has been linked to the deaths
and disappearances of hundreds of Hondurans;
* Crafting human rights reports that carefully
exclude a pattern of torture and human rights violations covered
by the entire Honduran media and later documented by the CIA;
* Brokering a steady stream of U.S. aid
to Honduras in exchange for the right to use the country as a
launching pad for the U.S.-backed Contra attack on Nicaragua.
As ambassador, Negroponte will not simply
take over U.S. occupation head L. Paul Bremer's offices; he will
also take over his role as the ultimate political authority in
the country. While a handpicked interim government will have nominal
control, Negroponte will wield real power. He will coordinate
with coalition military forces, which will operate under a U.S.
chain of command and retain control over security for the country.
He will be in charge of the $20 billion U.S. reconstruction budget.
And his office will absorb the officials currently working in
the Coalition Provisional Authority. To be successful, the U.S.
needs to create the appearance of a sovereign government while
controlling the key decisions from behind the scenes. They need
someone who can quietly carry out U.S. interests while working
to suppress the inevitable resistance. And no one understands
the difference between appearances and reality better than John
Negroponte.
Deadly credentials
Though Negroponte is most notorious for
his role in the dirty wars of Central America when serving as
ambassador to Honduras in the early 1980s, his political career
serves as something of a road map of U.S. imperialist strategy
over the last thirty-five years.
Negroponte's reputation as a hard-line
cold warrior goes back to his early days serving in Vietnam. He
got his start as a junior political officer at the U.S. embassy
in Saigon in the early 1960s-just as the U.S. was intensifying
its involvement in Vietnam. He was present at the Paris peace
talks where he argued that his mentor Henry Kissinger was making
too many concessions. He eventually left Kissinger's National
Security Council over these differences.
After the U.S. defeat in Vietnam, the
government found itself reluctant to commit a large number of
troops abroad and to aggressively pursue its aims. This "Vietnam
syndrome" tied the hands of the United States and gave confidence
to national liberation movements around the world. But hawks within
the U.S. military establishment refused to accept such limitations
on U.S. power. John Negroponte was one such figure. At his Senate
confirmation hearing in 1981, he spoke for many military and political
figures when he said: "I believe we must do our best not
to allow the tragic outcome of Indochina to be repeated in Central
America""
When the Sandanistas overthrew a U.S.-backed
dictator in Nicaragua in 1979 and inspired revolutionary movements
in Guatemala and El Salvador, Central America became the flashpoint
for a new cold war. In the 1980s, the Reagan administration launched
a covert war to overthrow the government in Nicaragua and to turn
back the insurgency throughout Latin America. The tiny country
of Honduras, lying at the crossroads of Guatemala, El Salvador,
and Nicaragua, became the main staging ground for this operation.
In the process, a country that had known relative social peace
became a land of the disappeared and death squads.
No one was more central to the success
of U.S. operations in Honduras than John Negroponte. Negroponte,
who served as Reagan's ambassador from 1981 to 1985, wielded so
much power in the country that he was known as the proconsul.
During his reign, the U.S. embassy staff in Honduras increased
ten-fold and came to house one of the largest CIA deployments
in all of Latin America."
Negroponte was responsible for ensuring
that arms could flow smoothly through Honduras, that the U.S.
could conduct training exercises there, and that the Honduran
army was sufficiently equipped and supported to wipe out any rebels
within its borders. U.S. military aid to Honduras increase from
$4 million in 1980 to $77 million in 1984. By 1985, its economic
aid had surpassed $200 million-becoming the world's eighth largest
recipient of U.S. aid."
Negroponte played a key role in organizing
pro-Contra projects such as a U.S. counter-insurgency center at
Puerto Castilla. Between 1981 and 1986, more than 60,000 U.S.
soldiers and National Guard members traversed Honduras in military
exercises that delivered arms to the Contras. He supervised the
creation of the El Aguacate air base, which the U.S. used as a
training facility for the Contras. The base was also used as a
secret detention and torture center-the Abu Ghraib of its day.
In August 2001, excavations performed at the base uncovered 185
corpses, evidence of those thought to have been killed and buried
there."
Negroponte was the central agent overseeing
a plan for the CIA to train a special intelligence unit under
the direction of the chief of the Honduran armed forces General
Gustavo Alvarez. Multiple investigations by the Honduran government,
the CIA inspector general, and major newspapers have since revealed
that this unit, Battalion 316, operated as a death squad in Honduras.
Throughout its existence, Battalion 316 kidnapped suspects, used
extensive means of torture in its interrogations, and then killed
and dumped the bodies of those that were no longer useful. The
exact number of people killed by Battalion 316 remains unknown.
As of late 1993, the Honduran government listed 184 people as
missing and presumed dead.
The cold warrior Negroponte and the ardent
anti-communist General Alvarez made natural collaborators. In
a 1983 interview, Negroponte told New York Times correspondent
James LeMoyne that "Marxist guerrillas are organizing here."
He went on to say that Alvarez was a hard man but an effective
officer."
Alvarez believed that the only way to
deal with "subversives" was with terror and violence.
In a cable to Washington, former ambassador Jack Binns reported
with alarm a conversation he had had with the general. 'Alvarez
stressed to me that democracies and the West are soft, perhaps
too soft to resist Communist subversion. The Argentines, he said,
had met the threat effectively, identifying-and taking care of
the subversives. Their method, he opined, is the only effective
way of meeting the challenge."" (In the mid-1970s, more
than 12,000 Argentines were disappeared in a state-directed campaign
of repression.)
With U.S. cooperation, Argentine military
leaders were invited to Honduras to train Contra fighters and
Honduran military officers in Battalion 316. Later, these leaders
were trained by U.S. CIA agents both in Honduras and in the United
States. Former members of the battalion have testified extensively
about the training they received. Oscar Alvarez, a former Honduran
special forces officer and diplomat, told the Baltimore Sun:
The Argentines came in first, and they
taught us how to disappear people. The United States made them
more efficient. They said, "You need someone to tap phones,
you need someone to transcribe the tapes, you need surveillance
groups." They taught us interrogation techniques.
The CIA training has been confirmed by
Richard Stolz-who was deputy director of operations at the time-in
secret testimony before the Senate in 1988. Stolz told the Select
Committee on Intelligence, "The course
consisted of three weeks of classroom instruction followed by
two weeks of practical exercises, which included the questioning
of actual prisoners by the students.""
Although Negroponte would step in when
a case threatened to get out of hand, he did not interfere with
the activities of Battalion 316. In fact, Negroponte continued
to deliver glowing reports of General Alvarez and the Honduran
military throughout his tenure as ambassador. 'When General Alvarez
came under attack, the ambassador was quick to deny any claims
against him. On Negroponte's recommendation, Reagan awarded Alvarez
the Legion of Merit for "encouraging democracy" in 1983.
In order to keep a stream of U.S. funds
flowing, Negroponte consistently turned his back on and covered
up pervasive human rights abuses in Honduras. Reading the reports
filed by Negroponte's office between 1981 and 1985, one would
imagine Honduras to be a constitutional democracy with full democratic
rights. But his predecessor, Jack Binns, painted a very different
picture in his cables to Washington. In a 1981 cable, Binns reported:
"I am deeply concerned at increasing evidence of officially
sponsored/sanctioned assassinations of political and criminal
targets, which clearly indicate [Honduran government] repression
has built up a head of steam much faster than we had anticipated.""
In response, Binns was brought to Washington
and told by assistant secretary of state for inter-American affairs
Thomas Enders, "to stop human rights reporting except in
back channel. The fear was that if it came into the State Department,
it will leak. They wanted to keep assistance flowing. Increased
violations by the Honduran military would prejudice that."
Enders confirmed Binn's account of the 1981 meeting: "I told
him that whereas human rights violations had been the single most
important focus of the previous administration's policy in Latin
America, the Reagan administration had broader interests."
Shortly thereafter, Binns was removed from his post and replaced
by Negroponte.
Despite the rising tide of violence and
the increasing disappearances of Honduran citizens, Negroponte
continued to send glowing reports to Washington. The 1983 State
Department human rights report on Honduras claimed, "There
are no political prisoners in Honduras."" However, it
would have been impossible for Negroponte not to have known about
political prisoners and rights abuses. Honduran papers carried
daily reports of the violence, including full-page pictures of
the missing. In 1982 alone, there were at least 318 published
stories of military violence. Members of Congress drafted resolutions
calling for an investigation into the disappearances. And there
were numerous demonstrations, numbering in the hundreds, of the
families and friends of the disappeared."
Negroponte could not have missed the growing
pile of evidence that human rights abuses were being committed.
In fact, subsequent reports and investigations reveal an attempt
to systematically cover up such abuses. Rick Chidester, a junior
political officer in the embassy, compiled substantial evidence
of abuses in 1982 but claims he was ordered to delete most of
it from the human rights report prepared for the State Department."
This dovetails with a report that the CIA inspector general made
in the early 1990s. Though the published version of the report
is heavily edited, it does show that diplomats serving under Negroponte
were discouraged from reporting abuses.
A diplomat whose name is blacked out in
the report is quoted saying, "the embassy country team in
Honduras wanted reports on subjects such as this to be benign."
The inspector general goes on to conclude that Negroponte
was particularly sensitive regarding the
issue and was concerned that earlier CIA reporting on the same
topic might create human rights problems for Honduras. Based on
the ambassador's reported concerns, actively discouraged from
following up the information reported by the source.
The following two pages of the report
are entirely blacked out." Negroponte displayed the defining
characteristics necessary for imposing the will of a foreign government
on an unwilling population: a casual disdain for the truth, a
willingness to work with despots and dictators, and the ability
to turn a blind eye to human rights abuses.
After the Iran-Contra scandal (during
which it was revealed that the Reagan administration secretly
traded arms to Iran, and U.S. agencies engaged in cocaine trafficking,
to fund the Contras), Negroponte did have some difficulty finding
another diplomatic post. Eventually, though, he became U.S. ambassador
to Mexico where he helped to push through neoliberal economic
measures. In 1993, President Clinton appointed him ambassador
to the Philippines.
But his true comeback came in 2001 when
George W. Bush picked him for the role of U.S. ambassador to the
United Nations. Negroponte was one of a series of former Contra
era officials to be nominated by the Bush administration, including
Elliot Abrams, a former assistant secretary of state under Reagan,
who had been convicted for his role in the Iran-Contra affair.
Negroponte's appointment, in particular, signaled a new posture
for the U.S. vis-à-vis the United Nations. A State Department
official explained it this way:
In this new administration, we have a
lot of people who are a decade or two older than the people who
had the same jobs in the last administration. They remember the
cold war. They want to reward and elevate people who fought on
our side, including people who supported the contras. Negroponte
is known as a guy who is devoted to realpolitik, which is in many
ways the opposite of what the UN stands for. Giving him this job
is a way of telling the UN: "We hate you."
Although Negroponte's nomination was initially
held up in the Senate, after the September 11 attacks he was quickly
confirmed. As U.S. ambassador to the UN, Negroponte has once again
shown his ability to push through U.S. foreign policy objectives
at any cost. Early on in his tenure, he delivered a threat to
shut down military bases in any country that signed on to the
International Criminal Court."
More important, he negotiated a unanimous
vote on UN Resolution 1441, the resolution that allowed weapons
inspectors back into Iraq and provided the pretext for the U.S.
war in Iraq. In order to achieve this unanimity, he strong-armed
Mexico and Chile into recalling their ambassadors." In October
2003, after the U.S. had gone to war in defiance of the United
Nations, Negroponte spent seven weeks winning support for a UN
resolution that effectively endorsed the U.S. occupation.
Today, he is a key player in getting the
UN to provide crucial cover for the ongoing occupation of Iraq.
The reality is that the U.S. aims to have a military presence
in Iraq well into the future. As ambassador, John Negroponte's
job will be to put a
diplomatic cover on that presence while
organizing repression of any resistance to American objectives.
In the last months, the whole world has seen the brutality that
the U.S. must inflict to achieve its aims against the democratic
aspirations of the occupied Iraqis. Over a decades-long career,
John Negroponte has become a master of working with and covering
up such brutality. His past "achievements" show us the
future that the U.S. envisions for Iraq-and it is the opposite
of liberation.
*****
John Negroponte - from the book Robbing Us Blind - Steve Brouwer
- p181
John Negroponte was never pursued by Congress
for his old role as the ambassador to Honduras in the 1980s, even
though he was one of those responsible for coordinating aid to
the Nicaraguan Contras and holding together the dictatorship of
an assortment of Honduran generals. Although the level of brutality
toward the people of Honduras was lower than in the war zones
on either side of them, there were hundreds of assassinations
and disappearances perpetrated by the ruling Honduran military's
notorious Battalion 3-16, a U.S. trained unit; one of their victims
was Joseph Carney, a Jesuit priest from the U.S. Negroponte's
job was to keep silent about their atrocities and help cover them
up.
The Bush Gang brought Negroponte back
in 2001 as Ambassador to the United Nations, where he had the
tricky task of feigning to work at diplomacy with the other member
states while trying to make it possible for the United States
to pursue its aggressive objectives without being constrained
by the UN...
Zeroes page
Index
of Website
Home Page