The Long Secret Alliance:
Uncle Sam and Pol Pot
by John Pilger
Covert Action Quarterly Fall 1997
The US not only helped create conditions that brought Cambodia's
Khmer Rouge to power in 1975, but actively supported the genocidal
force, politically and financially. By January 1980, the US was
secretly funding Pol Pots exiled forces on the Thai border. The
extent of this support-$85 million from 1980 to 1986-was revealed
six years later in correspondence between congressional lawyer
Jonathan Winer, then counsel to Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) of the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and the Vietnam Veterans of
America Foundation. Winer said the information had come from the
Congressional Research Service (CRS). When copies of his letter
were circulated, the Reagan administration was furious. Then,
without adequately explaining why, Winer repudiated the statistics,
while not disputing that they had come from the CRS. In a second
letter to Noam Chomsky, however, Winer repeated the original charge,
which, he confirmed to me, was "absolutely correct.''
Washington also backed the Khmer Rouge through the United
Nations, which provided Pol Pot's vehicle of return. Although
the Khmer Rouge government ceased to exist in January 1979, when
the Vietnamese army drove it out, its representatives continued
to occupy Cambodia's UN seat. Their right to do so was defended
and promoted by Washington as an extension of the Cold War, as
a mechanism for US revenge on Vietnam, and as part of its new
alliance with China (Pol Pot's principal underwriter and Vietnam's
ancient foe). In 1981, President Carter's national security adviser,
Zbigniew Brzezinski, said, "I encouraged the Chinese to support
Pol Pot." The US, he added, "winked publicly" as
China sent arms to the Khmer Rouge through Thailand.
As a cover for its secret war against Cambodia, Washington
set up the Kampuchean Emergency Group (KEG) in the US embassy
in Bangkok and on the Thai-Cambodian border. KEG's job was to
"monitor" the distribution of Western humanitarian supplies
sent to the refugee camps in Thai land and to ensure that Khmer
Rouge bases were fed. Working through "Task Force 80"
of the Thai Army, which had liaison officers with the Khmer Rouge,
the Americans ensured a constant flow of UN supplies. Two US relief
aid workers, Linda Mason and Roger Brown, later wrote, "The
US Government insisted that the Khmer Rouge be fed ... the US
preferred that the Khmer Rouge operation benefit from the credibility
of an internationally known relief operation."
In 1980, under US pressure, the World Food Program handed
over food worth $12 million to the Thai army to pass on to the
Khmer Rouge. According to former Assistant Secretary of State
Richard Holbrooke "20,000 to 40 000 Pol Pot guerrillas benefited."
This aid helped restore the Khmer Rouge to a fighting force, based
in Thailand, from which it de stabilized Cambodia for more than
Although ostensibly a State Department operation, KEG's principals
were intelligence officers with long experience in Indochina.
In the early 1980s it was run by Michael Eiland, whose career
underscored the continuity of American intervention in Indochina.
In 1969-70, he was operations officer of a clandestine Special
Forces group code-named "Daniel Boone," which was responsible
for the reconnaissance of the US bombing of Cambodia. By 1980,
Col. Eiland was running KEG out of the US embassy in Bangkok,
where it was de scribed as a "humanitarian" organization.
Responsible for interpreting satellite surveillance photos of
Cambodia, Eiland became a valued source for some of Bangkok's
resident Western press corps, who referred to him in their reports
as a "Western analyst." Eiland's "humanitarian"
duties led to his appointment as Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
chief in charge of the South east Asia Region, one of the most
important positions in US espionage.
In November 1980, the just elected Reagan administration and
the Khmer Rouge made direct contact when Dr. Ray Cline, a former
deputy director of the CIA, secretly visited a Khmer Rouge operational
headquarters inside Cambodia. Cline was then a foreign policy
adviser on President-elect Reagan's transitional team. Within
a year, according to Washington sources, 50 CIA agents were running
Washington's Cambodia operation from Thailand. The dividing line
between the international relief operation and the US war became
more and more confused. For example, a Defense Intelligence Agency
colonel was appointed "security liaison officer" between
the United Nations Border Relief Operation (UNBRO) and the Displaced
Persons Protection Unit (DPPU). In Washington, sources revealed
him as a link between the US government and the Khmer Rouge.
The UN as a Base
By 1981, a number of governments, including US allies, became
decidedly uneasy about the charade of continued UN recognition
of Pol Pot as legitimate head of the country This discomfort was
dramatically demonstrated when a colleague of mine, Nicholas Claxton,
entered a bar at the UN in New York with Thaoun Prasith, Pol Pot's
representative. "Within minutes," said Claxton, "the
bar had emptied." Clearly, something had to be done. In 1982,
the US and China, supported by Singapore, invented the Coalition
of the Democratic Government of Kampuchea, which was, as Ben Kiernan
pointed out, neither a coalition, nor democratic, nor a government,
nor in Kampuchea. Rather, it was what the CIA calls "a master
illusion." Cambodia's former ruler, Prince Norodom Sihanouk,
was appointed its head; otherwise little changed. The Khmer Rouge
dominated the two "non-communist" members, the Sihanoukists
and the Khmer People's National Liberation Front (KPNLF). From
his office at the UN, Pol Pot's ambassador, the urbane Thaoun
Prasith, continued to speak for Cambodia. A close associate of
Pol Pot, he had in 1975 called on Khmer expatriates to return
home, whereupon many of them "disappeared."
The United Nations was now the instrument of Cambodia's punishment.
In all its history, the world body has withheld development aid
from only one Third World country: Cambodia. Not only did the
UN-at US and Chinese insistence-deny the government in Phnom Penh
a seat, but the major international financial institutions barred
Cambodia from all international agreements on trade and communications.
Even the World Health Organization refused to aid the country.
At home, the US denied religious groups export licenses for books
and toys for orphans. A law dating from the First World War, the
Trading with the Enemy Act, was applied to Cambodia and, of course,
Vietnam. Not even Cuba and the Soviet Union faced such a complete
ban with no humanitarian or cultural exceptions.
By 1987, KEG had been reincarnated as the Kampuchea Working
Group, run by the same Col. Eiland of the Defense Intelligence
Agency The Working Group's brief was to provide battle plans,
war materiel, and satellite intelligence to the so-called "non-communist"
members of the "resistance forces." The non-communist
fig leaf allowed Congress, spurred on by an anti-Vietnamese zealot,
then - Rep. Stephen Solarz (D-NY), to approve both "overt"
and "covert" aid estimated at $24 million to the "resistance
" Until 1990, Congress accepted Solarz' specious argument
that US aid did not end up with or even help Pol Pot and that
the mass murderers US-supplied allies "are not even in close
proximity with them [the Khmer Rouge] "
While Washington paid the bills and the Thai army provided
logistics support, Singapore, as middleman, was the main conduit
for Western arms. Former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew was a major
backer of the US and Chinese position that the Khmer Rouge be
part of a settlement in Cambodia. "It is journalists,"
he said, "who have made them into demons."
Weapons from West Germany, the US, and Sweden were passed
on directly by Singapore or made under license by Chartered Industries,
which is owned by the Singapore government. These same weapons
were captured from the Khmer Rouge. The Singapore connection allowed
the Bush administration to continue its secret aid to the "resistance,"
even though this assistance broke a law passed by Congress in
1989 banning even indirect "lethal aid" to Pol Pot.
In August 1990, a former member of the US Special Forces disclosed
that he had been ordered to destroy records that showed US munitions
in Thailand going to the Khmer Rouge. The records, he said, implicated
the National Security Council, the president's foreign policy
In 1982, when the US, Chinese, and ASEAN governments contrived
the "coalition" that enabled Pol Pot to retain Cambodia's
UN seat, the US set about training and equipping the "non-communist"
factions in the "resistance" army These followers of
Prince Sihanouk and his former minister, Son Sann, leader of the
KPNLF, were mostly irregulars and bandits. This resistance was
nothing with out Pol Pot's 25,000 well-trained, armed and motivated
guerrillas, whose leadership was acknowledged by Prince Sihanouk's
military commander, his son, Norodom Ranariddh. "The Khmer
Rouge'' he said, are the "major attacking forces" whose
victories were "celebrated as our own."'
The guerrillas' tactic like that of the Contras in Nicaragua,
was to terrorize the countryside by setting up ambushes and seeding
minefields. In this way, the government in Phnom Penh would be
destabilized and the Vietnamese trapped in an untenable war: its
own "Vietnam." For the Americans in Bangkok and Washington,
the fate of Cambodia was tied to a war they had technically lost
seven years earlier. "Bleeding the Vietnamese white on the
battlefields of Cambodia" was an expression popular with
the US policy-making establishment. Destroying the crippled Vietnamese
economy and, if necessary overturning the government in Hanoi,
was the ultimate goal. Out of that ruin, American power would
again assert itself in Indochina.
The British-who have had special military forces in Southeast
Asia since World War II, also played a key role in supporting
Pol Pot's armed force. After the "Irangate" arms-for-hostages
scandal broke in Washington in 1986, the Cambodian training became
an exclusively British operation. "If Congress had found
out that Americans were mixed up in clandestine training in Indochina,
let alone with Pol Pot," a Ministry of Defense source told
Simon O'Dwyer-Russell of the London Sunday Telegraph, "the
balloon would have gone right up. It was one of those classic
Thatcher-Reagan arrangements. It was put to her that the SAS should
take over the Cambodia show, and she agreed."'
Pol Pot's Washington Impunity
Shortly after the start of the Gulf War in January 1991, President
Bush described Saddam Hussein as "Adolf Hitler revisited.''
Bush's call for "another Nuremberg" to try Saddam under
the Genocide Convention was echoed in Congress and across the
Atlantic in London.
It was an ironic distraction. Since the original Fuhrer expired
in his bunker, the US has maintained a network of dictators with
Hitlerian tendencies-from Suharto in Indonesia to Mobutu in Zaire
and a variety of Latin American mobsters, many of them graduates
of the US Army School of the Americas. But only one has been identified
by the world community as a genuine "Adolf Hitler revisited,"
whose crimes are documented in a 1979 report of the UN Human Rights
Commission as "the worst to have occurred anywhere in the
world since Nazism.'' He is, of course, Pol Pot, who must surely
wonder at his good fortune. Not only was he cosseted, his troops
fed, supplied, and trained, his envoys afforded all diplomatic
privileges, but-unlike Saddam Hussein-he was assured by his patrons
that he would never be brought to justice for his crimes.
These assurances were given publicly in 1991 when the UN Human
Rights Subcommission dropped from its agenda a draft resolution
on Cambodia that referred to "the atrocities reaching the
level of genocide committed in particular during the period of
Khmer Rouge rule." No more, the UN body decided, should member
governments seek to "detect, arrest, extradite or bring to
trial those who have been responsible for crimes against humanity
in Cambodia." No more are governments called upon to "prevent
the return to government positions of those who were responsible
for genocidal actions during the period 1975 to 1978."
Such guarantees of impunity for the genocidists were also
part of the UN "peace plan" drafted by the permanent
members of the Security Council: that is, by the United States.
To avoid offending Pol Pot's principal backers, the Chinese, the
plan dropped all mention of "genocide," replacing it
with the euphemism: "policies and practices of the recent
past.'' On this, Henry Kissinger, who played a leading pan in
the mass bombing of Cambodia in the early 1970s, was an important
Western propaganda prior to the UN "peace process"
in Cambodia concentrated on the strength of the Khmer Rouge, so
as to justify their inclusion. UN officials and American and Australian
diplomats talked about 35-40,000 Khmer Rouge. "You will understand,"
they would say, "we can't leave a force as powerful as that
outside the tent." As soon as the Khmer Rouge had been welcomed
back to Phnom Penh and, in effect, given a quarter to a third
of the countryside, they refused to take part in the elections.
The tune then changed. They were now "finished," chorused
Western diplomats. They were "weakened beyond hope."
In the meantime, the Khmer Rouge was establishing itself as
the richest terrorist group in history by selling off tracts of
Cambodia's forests, as well as its precious stones, to the Thai,
whose government was a signatory to the "peace accords."
No one stopped them. They established four large new bases inside
Thailand, complete with a field hospital. Thai soldiers guarded
the road that led to them. The "they are finished" line
remains in vogue to this day Undoubtedly, they have been numerically
diminished by defections and attrition, but their number was always
a false measure of their true strength. It seems the State Department
believes they are far from finished.
On July 10 this year, the spokesperson Nicholas Burns let
slip that Khmer Rouge strength ran into "thousands. "
The real threat from the Khmer Rouge comes from their enduring
skill at deception and infiltration. Before they seized power
in 1975, they had honeycombed Phnom Penh. This process is almost
certainly under way again. As one resident of Phnom Penh said
recently, "They're everywhere." The "trial"
of Pol Pot this year was a wonderful piece of Khmer Rouge theater
cum-media-event, but was otherwise worthless as an indication
of the organizations strength and immediate aims. The truth is
that no one on the outside can really say what these are, and
that alone is a measure of the organization's strength and resilience.
The Cambodian leader Hun Sen, for one, clearly retains a respect
for the veracity and menace of their ambitions.
The media relish Pol Pot as a unique monster. That is too
easy and too dangerous. It is his Faustian partners in Washington,
Beijing, London, Bangkok, Singapore, and elsewhere who deserve
proper recognition. The Khmer Rouge have been useful to all their
converging aims in the region. Eric Falt, the UN's senior spokesperson
in Phnom Penh at the time of that manipulated organization's "triumph"
in Cambodia, told me with a fixed smile, "The peace process
was aimed at allowing [the Khmer Rouge to gain respectability."
Unfortunately, many ordinary Cambodian people share his cynicism.
They deserve better.
Policy and Pentagon