
Sean Penn - United States

Sean Penn
Sean Penn received The 2006 Christopher
Reeve First Amendment Award from The Creative Coalition, December
18, 2006, in New York City, where he delivered the following speech.
The Christopher Reeve First Amendment
Award. For the purposes of tonight and my own personal enjoyment,
I'm going to yield to the notion that I deserve this.
And in the spirit of that, tell you that
I am very honored to receive it. And for this I thank the Creative
Coalition and my friend Charlie Rose. It does seem appropriate
to take this opportunity to exercise the right that honors us
all - freedom of speech.
Note for later:
The original title for the Louis XVI comedy
called "Start The Revolution Without Me" was one of
my favorites. That original title was "Louis, There's a Crowd
Downstairs." But I'll come back to that...
Words may be our most civil weapons of
change, when they connect to actions of sacrifice, or good will,
but they have no grace or power without bold clarity. So, if you'll
bear with me, borrowing a line from Bob Dylan, "Let us not
talk falsely now - the hour is getting late."
Global warming
Massive pollution
Non-stop U.S. war in Iraq
Attacks on civil liberties under the banner
of war on terror
Military spending
You and I, U.S. taxpayers, spend 1 1/2
billion dollars on an Iraq-war-'focused' military everyday, while
social needs cry out.
Health care
Education
Public transit
Environmental protections
Affordable housing
Job training
Public investment
And, levy building.
We depend largely for information on these
issues from media industries, driven by the bottom line to such
an extent that the public interest becomes uninteresting.
And should we speak truth, we stand against
government efforts to intimidate or legislate in the service of
censorship. Whether under the guise of a Patriot Act or any other
benevolent-sounding rationale for the age-old game of shutting
down dissent by discouraging independent thinking and preventing
progressive social change.
The most effective forms of de facto censorship
are pre-emptive. Systemically, we are encouraged to keep our heads
down, out of the line of fire - to avoid the danger, god forbid,
that someone in the White House, on Capitol Hill, or a media blow-hard
might take a shot at us.
But, as a practical matter, most of the
limits on creative expression and other forms of free speech come
from self-censorship, where the mechanism of corporate clout offers
carrots and brandishes sticks. We avoid a conflict before the
conflict materializes. We reach for the carrots and stay out of
range of sticks.
Decades ago, Fred Friendly called it a
"positive veto" - corporations putting big money behind
shows that they want to establish and perpetuate. Whether in journalism
or drama, creative efforts that don't gain a financial "positive
veto" are dismissible, then dismissed. We may not call that
"censorship." But whatever we call it, the effects of
a "positive veto" system are severe. They impose practical
limits on efforts to bring the most important realities to public
attention sooner rather than later...
We're beginning to see more revealing
images of this war. But it's later now, isn't it? What we have
to pay attention to are the results of these "practical limits."
One, is that wars become much easier to launch than to halt.
I've got a feeling about how we can begin
to change this process and I want to pass it by you. Children
grow up in our country -- many by the way, under conditions of
extreme poverty -- and are told from a very early age "You
will be accountable!" "With freedom, comes responsibility!"
And so the lecture goes...Democratic and Republican alike. Lie-cheat-steal,
and there will be consequences! Theft will be punished. Actions
that cause the deaths of others will be severely punished. The
message, from leaders in Washington, news media, mom, dad, and
church is clear. Criminals MUST be held accountable.
Now, there's been a lot of talk lately
on Capitol Hill about how impeachment should be "off the
table." We're told that it's time to look ahead - not back...
Can you imagine how far that argument
would go for the defense at an arraignment on charges of grand
larceny, or large-scale distribution of methamphetamines? How
about the arranging of a contract killing on a pregnant mother?
"Indictment should be off the table." Or "Let's
look forward, not backward." Or "We can't afford another
failed defendant."
Our country has a legal system, not of
men and women, but of laws. Why then are we so willing to put
inconvenient provisions of the U.S. constitution and federal law
"off the table?" Our greatest concern right now should
be what to put ON the table. Unless we're going to have one set
of laws for the powerful and another set for those who can't afford
fancy lawyers, then truth matters to everyone. And accountability
is a matter of human and legal principle. If we're going to continue
wagging our fingers at the disadvantaged transgressors, then I
suggest we be consistent. If truth and accountability can be stretched
into sham concepts, we may as well open the gates of all our jails
and prisons, where, by the way, there are more people behind bars
than any other country in the world. One in every 32 American
adults is behind bars, on probation, or on parole as we stand
here tonight.
Which is to say that, globally, the United
States is number one at demanding accountability and backing up
that demand with imprisonment. But, when it comes to our president,
vice president, secretary of state, former secretary of defense...this
insistence on accountability vanishes. All of a sudden, what's
past is prologue. And we're just "forward-looking."
But some people can't just look forward. Men and women stationed
in Iraq at this moment, under orders of a Commander-in-Chief so
sufficiently practiced in the art of deception, that he got vast
numbers of American journalists and the most esteemed media outlets
of this country, including The New York Times, The Washington
Post, NPR, and PBS to eagerly serve his agenda-building for war.
And the process also induced vast numbers of artists and performers
(probably even some in this room tonight) to keep quiet and facilitate
the push for an invasion in Iraq.
I'm sure many people who I met in Baghdad,
both in my trips prior to and during the occupation, now similarly
cannot just look forward. With lives so entirely shattered by
a violence of occupation - an ongoing U.S. war effort and the
civil war that it has catalyzed. All on the back of a crumbled
infrastructure, following eleven years of devastating U.N. sanctions.
And, where is the accountability on behalf
of the American dead and wounded, their families, their friends,
and the people of the United States who have seen their country
become a world pariah. These events have been enabled by people
named Bush, Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, and Rice, as they continue
to perpetuate a massive fraud on American democracy and decency.
On January 11, 2003, I made an appearance
on Larry King's show following my first trip to Iraq. I suggested
that every American mother and father sit down with a scrap of
paper and pencil and scribble the following words: Dear Mr. and
Mrs. So-and-so -- We regret to inform you that your son or daughter
so-and-so, was killed in action in Iraq. I then asked that those
mothers and fathers complete that letter in whatever way might
comfort them should they receive it. When one considers what a
bewildered continuation of those words a parent might attempt
to write today, it seems inconceivable that this country could've
ever bought into this war. Who were those mothers and fathers
believing in?! We know it's not the administration alone, but
a culture at large, cloaking itself in self-righteousness, religion,
and adolescent hero-dreaming machismo. Would they have believed
Rush Limbaugh if they'd known he was high as a kite on OxyContin?
Would they have believed the factually impaired Bill O'Reilly
if they knew he was massaging his rectum with a loofah while telephonically
harassing a staffer? Hannity, had they known he was simply a whore
to the cause of his pimps - Murdoch and Ailes? Or the little bow-tie
putz, if they knew all he was seeking was a good laugh from Jon
Stewart? Maybe our countrymen and women were listening to Ted
Haggert while he was whiffing meth and boning a muscle-headed
gigolo? Or Mark Foley seeking junior weenis? Joe Lieberman, sitting
Shiva? And Toby Keith, singing about how big his boots are?
"Oh, there goes Sean...he had to
go and name-call. They say he can't help himself." Or, did
I name-call? Maybe I just quickly summed up 7 or 8 little truths.
Oh, no, you're right - I name-called. I said, "putz".
I take it back. Or, do I? Did I say "whore?" Pimp? These
are questions. But, the real and great questions of conscience
and accountability would not loom so ominously -- unanswered or
evaded at such tremendous cost -- without our day-to-day failure
to insist on genuine accountability. Of course we'd prefer some
easy ways to get there. But no easy ways exist. Not a new Congress.
Not Barack Obama. And, not John McCain. His courage in North Vietnamese
prison makes him a heroic man. His voting record in Congress makes
him a damaging public servant. We have gotta stand the fuck up
and show the world how powerful are the people in a democracy.
That's how we regain our position of example, rather than pariah,
to the world at large. And that is how we can begin to put up
our chins and allow pride and unification to raise our own quality
of life and security.
They tell us we lost 3,000 Americans on
9/11. Is that enough? We're about to match it. We're within weeks,
if not less, of killing 3,000 Americans in Iraq. I ask Speaker
Pelosi, can we put impeachment on the table then? Without former
FEMA chief Mike Brown being held accountable, post Katrina (scapegoat
though he may have been) we'd have had the same chaos and neglect
when Rita hit Houston. Think about it. And, the same people who
trumpet deterrence as a justification for punishment when we speak
of "crime and punishment," will boast their positive
thinking when dismissing the deterrent qualities of an impeachment
proceeding.
What is impeachment? It's not a Democratic
versus Republican event. Not if used responsibly. If the House
of Representatives votes to impeach this president, is he thrown
out of office? No, he is not thrown out of office. That is not
what impeachment is. Impeachment is the opportunity to proceed
with accountability and give our elected senators, democratic
and republican, the power to pursue a thorough investigation.
The power to put the truth on the table. Mothers and fathers are
losing their kids to horrifying deaths in this war every single
day. Horrible deaths. Horrible maimings. Were crimes committed
in enlisting the support of our country in this decision to go
to war? For the moment we're living the most spineless of scenarios;
where the hawks abused impeachment eight years ago, now, the rest
of us politely refuse to use it today. Let's give the whistle-blowers
cover, let's get the subpoenas out there, and then, one by one,
put this administration under oath. And then, if the crimes of
"Treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors"
are proven, do as Article 2, Section 4 of the United States Constitution
provides, and remove "the President, Vice President and...civil
officers of the United States" from office. If the Justice
Department then sees fit to bunk them up with Jeff Skilling, so
be it.
So...look, if we attempt to impeach for
lying about a blowjob, yet accept these almost certain abuses
without challenge, we become a cum-stain on the flag we wave.
You know, I was listening to Frank Rich this morning, speaking
on a book tour. He said he thought impeachment proceedings would
amount to a "decadent" sidetrack, while our soldiers
were still being killed. I admire Frank Rich. And of course he
would be right if impeachment is all we do. But we're Americans.
We can do two things at the same time. Yes, let's move forward
and swiftly get out of this war in Iraq AND impeach these bastards.
Christopher Reeve promised to get out
of that chair. Well, I don't know about you, but it feels like
he's up now and I wouldn't be standing here if it weren't on his
shoulders. Let it be for something.
Georgie, there's a crowd downstairs.
Thank you and good night.
Heroes
Home Page