Of Gods and Mortals and Empire
[Project for the New American
by William Rivers Pitt, February
t r u t h o u t 2002
"To plunder, to slaughter, to steal,
these things they misname empire; and where they make a wilderness,
they call it peace." Tacitus
It sounded like two behemoth icebergs
colliding in the North Atlantic, but you needed the right kind
of ears to hear it. Two immensely powerful forces crashed into
each other over the weekend of February 15th, and the resulting
thunder has set the world to trembling.
On one side were the people, who took
to the streets all across the world by the tens of millions to
stand against George W. Bush's push for pre-emptive war on Iraq.
The numbers, and the locations, were staggering. More than 100,000
people took to the streets of Sydney, Australia, a nation that
has been solidly in Bush's corner on this matter. In Spain, another
member of Bush's "Coalition of the Willing," several
million protesters took over Madrid, Barcelona and 55 other cities.
Italy, another Bush ally, saw over a million citizens take to
the streets of Rome. Britain, Bush's go/no go ally of allies,
saw over a million people protesting in London. Police there said
it was the largest demonstration in that nation's long history.
The Netherlands saw one hundred thousand
protesters, as did Belgium and Ireland. There were protesters
by the tens of thousands in Sweden, Switzerland, Scotland, Denmark,
Austria, Canada, South Africa, Mexico, Greece, Russia and Japan.
500,000 protesters demonstrated in Germany, joined by three members
of Gerhard Schroder's cabinet who defied their Chancellor by being
there. It was the largest demonstration ever in post-war Germany.
Another 500,000 people marched in Paris and 60 other French cities.
The United States of America saw protests
from coast to coast in over 100 cities nationwide. New York City
was paralyzed by over a million marchers. San Francisco was taken
over by well over 200,000 protesters, and Los Angeles saw over
100,000 people take to the streets. Thousands upon thousands joined
them in Chicago, Philadelphia, Miami and Seattle.
This was a gathering of ordinary citizens
who came together in the streets of the world in an organized
event that has no precedent in all of human history. They were
brought together by a global word-of-mouth activism rooted entirely
in the Internet. Were it not for this planetary connection, no
such coordination could have ever taken place. Once upon a time,
the world wide web was a realm dominated by dreams of profit and
marketing. Those dreams have soured, leaving behind a marvelous
network now utilized by very average people who can, with the
click of a button, bring forth from all points on the compass
a roaring deluge of humanity to stand against craven injustice
and ruinous war.
The weekend of February 15th saw this
force ram headlong into the will of men who walk in shadow, whose
hands wield lightning and steel, pestilence and famine. In their
ranks stand Presidents, Prime Ministers, corporate magnates, untouchable
billionaires, and the advisors who whisper to them of empire and
domination. They are few in number, but life and death flows from
their fingertips in freshets and gouts. These men control the
armies and navies of great nations, nuclear and chemical nightmares
beyond measure, unassailable technological weapons and walls,
the financial cords which hold the package together, the water,
the air, the oil, the law, and a global media machine by which
they can obscure their designs with pleasing lies.
No mere citizen could do what these men
in one moment can do with the crooking of a little finger. With
a word, they can erase cities, deprive an entire populace of water
and light, unleash disease and famine, annihilate the economies
of dozens of nations, and imprison forever anyone who dares dissent.
These men bleed, they sicken, they die, but in their time of life
they can punch holes in the sky large enough to make Zeus wince
with envy. Like the millions who marched, the gathering of such
fearful powers into the hands of so few is also without precedent
in all of human history.
There was, among the millions who stormed
the planet last weekend, a misconception that masked the true
reason for their presence in the streets. A great many people
believe this looming war with Iraq is about old grudges and oil.
There is logic in this; Iraq has the second largest proven stores
of precious petroleum in the world, and there is a definite history
of malice between House Bush and House Hussein. The truth of the
matter is far more broad and deep, belittling all talk of terrorism,
weapons of mass destruction, and even oil. The men who pursue
their goals by way of this war have a great many desires on their
minds, and once more, they have the will to attain these goals
by whatever means is required.
Were the protesters fully aware of whom
they faced, a good many of them may well have fled in terror to
cower in their homes. One does not lightly bait a bear with such
Does this all sound like some paranoid
fantasy? If so, allow me to introduce The Project for the New
The Project for the New American Century,
or PNAC, is a Washington-based think tank created in 1997. Above
all else, PNAC desires and demands one thing: The establishment
of a global American empire to bend the will of all nations. They
chafe at the idea that the United States, the last remaining superpower,
does not do more by way of economic and military force to bring
the rest of the world under the umbrella of a new socio-economic
The fundamental essence of PNAC's ideology
can be found in a White Paper produced in September of 2000 entitled
"Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources
for a New Century." In it, PNAC outlines what is required
of America to create the global empire they envision. According
to PNAC, America must:
* Reposition permanently based forces
to Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East;
* Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing
our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet capabilities;
* Develop and deploy a global missile
defense system, and develop a strategic dominance of space;
* Control the "International Commons"
* Increase defense spending to a minimum
of 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from the 3 percent
Most ominously, this PNAC document described
four "Core Missions" for the American military. The
two central requirements are for American forces to "fight
and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars,"
and to "perform the 'constabulary' duties associated with
shaping the security environment in critical regions." Note
well that PNAC does not want America to be prepared to fight simultaneous
major wars. That is old school. In order to bring this plan to
fruition, the military must fight these wars one way or the other
to establish American dominance for all to see.
Why is this important? After all, wacky
think tanks are a cottage industry in Washington, DC. They are
a dime a dozen. In what way does PNAC stand above the other groups
that would set American foreign policy if they could?
Two events brought PNAC into the mainstream
of American government: the disputed election of George W. Bush,
and the attacks of September 11th. When Bush assumed the Presidency,
the men who created and nurtured the imperial dreams of PNAC became
the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White
House. When the Towers came down, these men saw, at long last,
their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy.
Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding
member of PNAC, along with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and
Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle. Deputy Defense Secretary
Paul Wolfowitz is the ideological father of the group. Bruce Jackson,
a PNAC director, served as a Pentagon official for Ronald Reagan
before leaving government service to take a leading position with
the weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin.
PNAC is staffed by men who previously
served with groups like Friends of the Democratic Center in Central
America, which supported America's bloody gamesmanship in Nicaragua
and El Salvador, and with groups like The Committee for the Present
Danger, which spent years advocating that a nuclear war with the
Soviet Union was "winnable."
PNAC has recently given birth to a new
group, The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which met with
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice in order to formulate
a plan to "educate" the American populace about the
need for war in Iraq. CLI has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars
to support the Iraqi National Congress and the Iraqi heir presumptive,
Ahmed Chalabi. Chalabi was sentenced in absentia by a Jordanian
court in 1992 to 22 years in prison for bank fraud after the collapse
of Petra Bank, which he founded in 1977. Chalabi has not set foot
in Iraq since 1956, but his Enron-like business credentials apparently
make him a good match for the Bush administration's plans.
PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses"
report is the institutionalization of plans and ideologies that
have been formulated for decades by the men currently running
American government. The PNAC Statement of Principles is signed
by Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, as well as by Eliot Abrams,
Jeb Bush, Bush's special envoy to Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad,
and many others. William Kristol, famed conservative writer for
the Weekly Standard, is also a co-founder of the group. The Weekly
Standard is owned by Ruppert Murdoch, who also owns international
media giant Fox News
The desire for these freshly empowered
PNAC men to extend American hegemony by force of arms across the
globe has been there since day one of the Bush administration,
and is in no small part a central reason for the Florida electoral
battle in 2000. Note that while many have said that Gore and Bush
are ideologically identical, Mr. Gore had no ties whatsoever to
the fellows at PNAC. George W. Bush had to win that election by
any means necessary, and PNAC signatory Jeb Bush was in the perfect
position to ensure the rise to prominence of his fellow imperialists.
Desire for such action, however, is by no means translatable into
workable policy. Americans enjoy their comforts, but don't cotton
to the idea of being some sort of Neo-Rome.
On September 11th, the fellows from PNAC
saw a door of opportunity open wide before them, and stormed right
Bush released on September 20th 2002 the
"National Security Strategy of the United States of America."
It is an ideological match to PNAC's "Rebuilding America's
Defenses" report issued a year earlier. In many places, it
uses exactly the same language to describe America's new place
in the world. Recall that PNAC demanded an increase in defense
spending to at least 3.8% of GDP. Bush's proposed budget for next
year asks for $379 billion in defense spending, almost exactly
3.8% of GDP.
In August of 2002, Defense Policy Board
chairman and PNAC member Richard Perle heard a policy briefing
from a think tank associated with the Rand Corporation. According
to the Washington Post and The Nation, the final slide of this
presentation described "Iraq as the tactical pivot, Saudi
Arabia as the strategic pivot, and Egypt as the prize" in
a war that would purportedly be about ridding the world of Saddam
Hussein's weapons. Bush has deployed massive forces into the Mideast
region, while simultaneously engaging American forces in the Philippines
and playing nuclear chicken with North Korea. Somewhere in all
this lurks at least one of the "major theater wars"
desired by the September 2002 PNAC report.
Iraq is but the beginning, a pretense
for a wider conflict. Donald Kagan, a central member of PNAC,
sees America establishing permanent military bases in Iraq after
the war. This is purportedly a measure to defend the peace in
the Middle East, and to make sure the oil flows. The nations in
that region, however, will see this for what it is: a jump-off
point for American forces to invade any nation in that region
they choose to. The American people, anxiously awaiting some sort
of exit plan after America defeats Iraq, will see too late that
no exit is planned.
All of the horses are traveling together
at speed here. The defense contractors who sup on American tax
revenue will be handsomely paid for arming this new American empire.
The corporations that own the news media will sell this eternal
war at a profit, as viewership goes through the stratosphere when
there is combat to be shown. Those within the administration who
believe that the defense of Israel is contingent upon laying waste
to every possible aggressor in the region will have their dreams
fulfilled. The PNAC men who wish for a global Pax Americana at
gunpoint will see their plans unfold. Through it all, the bankrollers
from the WTO and the IMF will be able to dictate financial terms
to the entire planet. This last aspect of the plan is pivotal,
and is best described in the newly revised version of Greg Palast's
masterpiece, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy."
There will be adverse side effects. The
siege mentality average Americans are suffering as they smother
behind yards of plastic sheeting and duct tape will increase by
orders of magnitude as our aggressions bring forth new terrorist
attacks against the homeland. These attacks will require the implementation
of the newly drafted Patriot Act II, an augmentation of the previous
Act that has profoundly sharper teeth. The sun will set on the
Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The American economy will be ravaged by
the need for increased defense spending, and by the aforementioned
"constabulary" duties in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.
Former allies will turn on us. Germany, France and the other nations
resisting this Iraq war are fully aware of this game plan. They
are not acting out of cowardice or because they love Saddam Hussein,
but because they mean to resist this rising American empire, lest
they face economic and military serfdom at the hands of George
W. Bush. Richard Perle has already stated that France is no longer
an American ally. As the eagle spreads its wings, our rhetoric
and their resistance will become more agitated and dangerous.
Many people, of course, will die. They
will die from war and from want, from famine and disease. At home,
the social fabric will be torn in ways that make the Reagan nightmares
of crack addiction, homelessness and AIDS seem tame by comparison.
This is the price to be paid for empire,
and the men of PNAC who now control the fate and future of America
are more than willing to pay it. For them, the benefits far outweigh
The plan was running smoothly until those
two icebergs collided. Millions and millions of ordinary people
are making it very difficult for Bush's international allies to
keep to the script. PNAC may have designs for the control of the
"International Commons" of the internet, but for now
it is the staging ground for a movement that would see empire
take a back seat to a wise peace, human rights, equal protection
under the law, and the preponderance of a justice that will, if
properly applied, do away forever with the anger and hatred that
gives birth to terrorism in the first place.
Tommaso Palladini of Milan perhaps said
it best as he marched with his countrymen in Rome. "You fight
terrorism," he said, "by creating more justice in the
The People versus the Powerful is the
oldest story in human history. At no point in history have the
Powerful wielded so much control. At no point in history has the
active and informed involvement of the People, all of them, been
more absolutely required. The tide can be stopped, and the men
who desire empire by the sword can be thwarted. It has already
begun, but it must not cease. These are men of will, and they
do not intend to fail.
William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times
bestselling author of two books - "War On Iraq" (with
Scott Ritter) available now from Context Books, and "The
Greatest Sedition is Silence," available in May 2003 from
Pluto Press. He teaches high school in Boston, MA.
Scott Lowery contributed research to this